with Steve Pratt, Author of the hit book Earn It

every podcast needs a job

Most branded podcasts begin with the wrong questions.

Who should host it?

Should it be audio or video?

How often should we publish?

Which studio should we use?

Those decisions matter. But they come later.

Before JAR designs a show, we define three things:

The Job. The Audience. The Result.

That is the J.A.R. System.

It gives every editorial, production, marketing and measurement decision a clear reason to exist.

A well-produced podcast can still fail.

The sound can be clean.

The guests can be impressive.

The graphics can move around beautifully.

But if the show does not have a clear business job, a specific audience and an agreed definition of success, the team eventually runs into the same problems:

  • Topics become harder to choose
  • Episodes begin to feel interchangeable
  • Promotion becomes an afterthought
  • Audience growth stalls
  • Leadership starts questioning the investment
  • Nobody can explain what should change next

This is rarely a production problem.

It is a clarity problem.

The J.A.R. System solves it before the microphone turns on.

Three decisions shape the entire show.

J IS FOR JOB

What must the podcast do for the organization?

“We want a podcast” is not a business objective.

A format cannot be the strategy.

The first step is identifying the job the show must perform.

That job might be to:

  • Build authority in an emerging category
  • Reach decision-makers who ignore traditional marketing
  • Change how an audience sees the brand
  • Support a complex sales conversation
  • Turn executive expertise into a recurring media property
  • Deepen relationships with customers or partners
  • Help employees understand organizational change
  • Create a trusted platform for an important industry conversation

A show can create several benefits.

But one job must lead.

Without that priority, the podcast becomes a container for whatever content happens to be available.

Questions we ask

  • What happened that made this worth discussing now?
  • What are you trying to accomplish that current content is not accomplishing?
  • What business problem sits underneath the podcast?
  • What would remain unresolved if the show did not exist?
  • What should the podcast make possible for the organization?

The output

A clear podcast job statement that guides the strategy.

Weak

Create a thought-leadership podcast about healthcare.

Stronger

Build trust with senior healthcare leaders by helping them understand how preventative health programs can improve workforce outcomes.

One gives the team direction.

The other gives them a category.

YouTube video
YouTube video

A IS FOR AUDIENCE

Who must choose the show?

A podcast for “business leaders” is a podcast for nobody in particular.

The audience must be specific enough that the editorial team can make real choices.

We define:

  • Who the show is for
  • What that audience already believes
  • What problems they are trying to solve
  • What content they already consume
  • Why they would choose this show
  • What would make them return
  • Where they are likely to discover it
  • What they should think, feel or do differently afterward

The goal is not to reach everyone.

It is to matter to the right people.

Questions we ask

  • Who specifically must think, feel or act differently?
  • What pressures are they under?
  • What do they already understand about this topic?
  • What are they tired of hearing?
  • Where is the useful conversation currently missing?
  • Why would they give this show thirty or forty minutes?
  • What would make them recommend it to someone else?

The output

A defined priority audience, supported by audience needs, behaviours and content triggers.

Broad

Business leaders.

Defined

Senior HR and benefits leaders at large employers who are under pressure to improve health outcomes while controlling long-term benefit costs.

That audience gives us something to design for.

It shapes the guests, topics, language, pacing, format, promotion and measurement.

R IS FOR RESULT

What evidence will show that the podcast worked?

Downloads matter.

They tell us whether the show is reaching people.

They do not tell us the whole story.

The right measurement depends on the job.

A podcast built to create category authority should not be judged exactly like a podcast built to support employee change or influence a sales pipeline.

Before launch, we define what success should look like and what evidence will make the investment easier to defend.

That may include:

  • Qualified audience growth
  • Listener or viewer retention
  • Repeat consumption
  • Time spent with the brand
  • Audience sentiment
  • Brand awareness or consideration
  • Sales-team usage
  • Executive engagement
  • Partner participation
  • Website behaviour
  • Newsletter growth
  • Lead influence
  • Employee understanding
  • Changes in perception or intent

Not every result can be attributed perfectly.

But every show should have a measurement plan that goes beyond counting plays.

Questions we ask

  • What would need to be true one year after launch for the investment to be considered successful?
  • What evidence would make the program easy to defend internally?
  • What should the audience understand or believe after engaging with the show?
  • What behaviour would signal meaningful progress?
  • Which metrics matter to leadership?
  • What decisions should the reporting help the team make?

The output

A measurement framework tied directly to the job of the podcast.

Incomplete

Grow downloads.

Useful

Reach and retain a qualified audience of senior HR leaders, increase familiarity with the employer offering and create content the sales team uses in active conversations.

Now the team knows what to measure.

More importantly, it knows what to improve.

YouTube video

the j.a.r. process

Most branded podcasts begin with the wrong questions.

Who should host it?

Should it be audio or video?

How often should we publish?

Which studio should we use?

Those decisions matter. But they come later.

Before JAR designs a show, we define three things:

The Job. The Audience. The Result.

That is the J.A.R. System.

It gives every editorial, production, marketing and measurement decision a clear reason to exist.


1. Diagnose the business situation

We begin with what changed, why the podcast matters now and what the organization needs it to accomplish.

This prevents the show from becoming a solution in search of a problem.

 

2. Define the Job

We identify the primary business role the podcast must perform and the decisions it should support.

 

3. Understand the Audience

We define who the show must reach, what they need and what will make the content worth choosing.

 

4. Agree on the Result

We establish the evidence that will indicate progress and the metrics that will help improve the program.

 

5. Design the show

Only then do we develop the concept, title, format, host approach, editorial territory, production model and audience-growth plan.

 

6. Build the growth and measurement plan

We establish the distribution approach, reporting baseline, platform tracking, audience signals and business indicators.

 

7. Produce, grow and improve

Once the show launches, the J.A.R. remains the decision filter.

We use performance data to improve topics, packaging, structure, promotion and future episodes.

 

 

What the J.A.R. System prevents

The vanity show

A podcast created mainly because an executive wants one.

The guest parade

A sequence of interviews with impressive people but no clear editorial territory.

The production-first show

A polished podcast built before the business problem has been defined.

The invisible show

A podcast launched without a realistic plan for discovery or audience growth.

The metric pile

A report full of numbers that does not explain whether the show is doing its job.

The endless season

A show that keeps publishing because nobody agreed on what success or failure would look like.


What the J.A.R. System prevents

Different podcasts. Clear jobs.

AMAZON: THIS IS SMALL BUSINESS

Job
Help aspiring entrepreneurs build the confidence and knowledge to start and grow a business.

Audience
Aspiring and early-stage small-business owners.

Result
More than one million downloads and a highly engaged audience spending over 2.5 hours every month with Amazon’s brand.

VIEW THE CASE STUDY

John Stackhouse hosting RBC’s Disruptors podcast, produced by JAR Podcast Solutions

RBC: DISRUPTORS

Job
Establish RBC as a trusted voice on innovation and Canada’s economic future.

Audience
Business leaders, policymakers, entrepreneurs and people shaping Canada’s economy.

Result
More than two million downloads and listener retention regularly reaching 85% to 95% on episodes.

VIEW THE CASE STUDY

AMERICAN EXPRESS: BUILD IT BRAVER

Job
Build awareness and consideration with women business owners through practical, credible stories.

Audience
Entrepreneurs building and growing businesses.

Result
Approximately 90% listener retention and measurable gains in brand awareness and consideration.

VIEW THE CASE STUDY

What makes JAR different

Many podcast agencies begin with production.

JAR begins with the business problem.

We bring strategy, editorial development, research, writing, host preparation, audio and video production, audience growth and performance reporting into one accountable program.

The J.A.R. System connects those disciplines.

It keeps the show useful to the audience and useful to the organization.

Both conditions matter.

Is the J.A.R. System right for
your organization?

The system works best for organizations that:

Have meaningful expertise to share

Need to reach or influence a specific audience

Want editorial judgment, not just production support

Care about audience development and measurement

Need the podcast to support a real organizational priority

Are prepared to make choices before making episodes

It is less useful for teams looking only for inexpensive recording or editing.

JAR does not produce personal-brand or political podcasts.

Start with the J.A.R.

JAR can help your team define the opportunity and build the strategy.

Before we get into production, we'll have:

A clear podcast Job
A defined priority Audience
An agreed Result
A differentiated show concept
An editorial framework
A recommended audio or video format
A host and guest approach
An audience-growth plan
A measurement framework
A production roadmap and budget

Frequently asked questions

What does J.A.R. stand for?
J.A.R. stands for Job, Audience and Result.
These are the three decisions JAR believes should be made before designing or producing a branded podcast.

Is the J.A.R. System only for new podcasts?
No. It can also be used to assess, reposition, improve or relaunch an existing show.
For an established podcast, we examine whether the original job is still relevant, whether the audience is clearly defined and whether the current measurement approach reflects the organization’s priorities.

How long does the strategy process take?
The timeline depends on the number of stakeholders, the complexity of the audience and the amount of existing research.
Most engagements move from diagnosis to a clear recommendation over several focused working sessions.
We usually have all strategy, show development, and 2 episodes (plus trailer) produced any live within 12 weeks. 

Does JAR recommend audio or video?
We recommend the format after defining the Job, Audience and Result.
Video can improve discovery and create useful marketing assets, but it also adds cost and creative complexity.
We recommend it when it improves the program, not simply because it is available.

How does JAR measure podcast ROI?
The measurement model depends on the job of the podcast.
We typically combine platform performance, audience engagement, retention, brand indicators and relevant business signals.
Downloads are part of the evidence. They are rarely the entire answer.

Can JAR develop the strategy without producing the podcast?
Perhaps. Reach out and we can discuss.

Can the J.A.R. System improve an existing podcast?
Yes. We assess whether the show still has a relevant job, a sufficiently defined audience and a useful measurement framework.
We then identify what should change.